<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FLSA Enterpirse Coverage Archives - Bober &amp; Bober</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.boberlaw.com/tag/flsa-enterpirse-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.boberlaw.com/tag/flsa-enterpirse-coverage/</link>
	<description>Florida Labor &#38; Law Attorney - Bober &#38; Bober</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:31:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Local Businesses Covered by FLSA if Employees Handle Materials</title>
		<link>https://www.boberlaw.com/2010/09/10/local-businesses-covered-by-flsa-if-employees-handle-materials/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samara Bober]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fair Labor Standards Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Come to Rest Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA Enterpirse Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polycarpe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultimate Consumer Defense]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boberlaw.com/?p=318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently handed down a decision, Polycarpe v. E&#38;S Landscaping Services, Inc., which rejected the argument by several employers that they were not a covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) as an enterprise because their business were local in nature. The businesses at issue performed landscaping, construction work, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.boberlaw.com/2010/09/10/local-businesses-covered-by-flsa-if-employees-handle-materials/">Local Businesses Covered by FLSA if Employees Handle Materials</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.boberlaw.com">Bober &amp; Bober</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently handed down a decision, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Polycarpe v. E&amp;S Landscaping Services, Inc.</span>, which rejected the argument by several employers that they were not a covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) as an enterprise because their business were local in nature. The businesses at issue performed landscaping, construction work, alarm system installation, or shutter installation.  The <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Polycarpe</span> decision reversed a number of trial courts that had erroneously restricted FLSA coverage.  It essentially put the Eleventh Circuit in line with all the other federal circuits that have squarely addressed the enterprise coverage issue, including the Third, Fourth Ninth, and Tenth Circuits (<em>e.g.,</em> <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Marshall v. Brunner</span>; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dole v. Odd Fellows Home Endowment Board</span>; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Brock v. Hamad</span>; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Donovan v. Scoles</span>; and, <a href="http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?tf=-1&amp;serialnum=1983143556&amp;rs=WLW9.08&amp;referencepositiontype=S&amp;ifm=NotSet&amp;fn=_top&amp;sv=Split&amp;referenceposition=1322&amp;pbc=3EC5366D&amp;tc=-1&amp;ordoc=2019186901&amp;findtype=Y&amp;db=350&amp;vr=2.0&amp;rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&amp;mt=Westlaw" target="_top"><span style="color: #000000;">Donovan v. Pointon</span></a><span style="color: #000000;">).  It also put the Eleventh Circuit in line with its prior interpretations of enterprise coverag</span>e; namely, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dunlop v. Indus. Am. Corp.</span>, which had noted that the FLSA reached retail and service establishments that were otherwise local in nature; and, and <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Green v. Propane Gas Serv. Inc.</span>, which held that the FLSA was “designed to regulate enterprises dealing in articles acquired intrastate after travel in interstate commerce.” </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.boberlaw.com/2010/09/10/local-businesses-covered-by-flsa-if-employees-handle-materials/">Local Businesses Covered by FLSA if Employees Handle Materials</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.boberlaw.com">Bober &amp; Bober</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
